kids learn self-reliance, adults whine about it
links disapprovingly to this story
about kids in a reality TV show where the kids are on their own for several weeks. Then he links approvingly to this moralizing comment
about the show.
I thought Glenn Reynolds believed in teaching kids to be tough and self-reliant. The show sounds great for a kid, something that I would have loved to do at that age. You think you know better than your parents? Well now's the time to prove it.
So some kid got splattered with hot cooking grease and another kid drank bleach (there's no way that happened to more than one kid unless it was a deliberate prank). Bad stuff happens. Bad stuff happens to kids every day. It's life. And if bad stuff is going to happen to kids, they may as well have a fun and exciting life in between.
You don't do your kids any favors by protecting them from the dangers inherent in fun activities. Some of my fondest memories as a kid involve doing things that parents would never have allowed. And the idea that we can let them have fun with careful supervision is just missing the point. They need to be outside of adult supervision so they can learn for themselves what is a good idea and what isn't. Kids that are constantly under responsible supervision learn that the highest priority in life is to not get hurt. Such kids grow up to be liberal pansies.
You know, liberal pansies --the ones who tell you that if you get mugged, you should just give up your wallet because money isn't worth getting hurt over. Liberal pansies are the ones who don't think you should own a gun, only the government --the surrogate adults-- should use guns. And liberal pansies are the ones who think that the government --the adults that they never had a chance to outgrow-- should take care of all of their needs.
Kids need to grow up. And to do that, they need to be on their own, they need to take risks, and yes, they need to get hurt. And when they get hurt they need to get up and go on having fun without going crying to their mommy or their government for solace. That's what makes them an adult.
UPDATE: Just saw another article on Captain's Quarters
. Ed Morrissey and Glenn Reynolds deserve a lot of credit for their valid and pointed criticism of the Networks. But I suspect that they have gotten so used to the major networks being run by dicks that they sometimes criticize the networks reflexively, even when the networks didn't do anything wrong. Those child-actor laws that Morrissey is talking about are pretty overbearing (as are most child-labor laws in this country). And the laws are intended to protect professional, long-term child actors, not kids involved in one six-week show.
A lot of the Captain's commenters seem to agree with me.
Huckabee wins Ames (in a manner of speaking)
I've been reading the Corner's blogging
on the Iowa Ames straw poll. The surprise second-place finisher at the Ames straw poll
was Mike Huckabee
. My first introduction to Mike Huckabee was in the FOX News Republican presidential debate when he was ambushed with a question about evolution. I'd never heard of him before, but the wording of the question warned me that Huckabee was a religious conservative who was about to embarrass* the Republican party by ranting about the godless evolutionists in our school system; instead, he surprised me with a very measured, humble, and forthright response
. I was especially happy that he took the questioner to task for bringing up the subject in the first place.
Huckabee continued to impress me in the debate, and I recall thinking afterward that I would like to support him, but that there were two contraindications. First, he was not one of the front runners --better to support Romney and see him win than support someone who has no chance and see Giuliani win. Second, Huckabee is a religiously-conservative former Baptist minister and I've always felt that a large proportion of the Bush hatred is inspired by religious bigotry against religiously conservative Christians. I'm not sure if the country can take another four years of this sort of animosity.
But this implies that we can never have another openly-Christian, openly-conservative person in the presidency without having 40% of the country hate, despise and revile him for the entire duration of his term. Has the social breakdown gone so far? I don't think I'm ready to throw in the towel on that score yet, and anyway, the Left has never seen a defeat that didn't call for a long, drawn out, vicious, intemperate, defamatory, mass hissy fit. So I decided that reason 2 was not a good reason; such thinking is a surrender to spite and hatred. It would be unjust if it were impossible for any committed Christian to be president just because so many Americans hate Christians. I want peace among Americans, but not more than I want justice.
And now, it seems that reason number 1 may no longer be valid. Noam Scheiber
there seem to be a lot of social conservatives currently supporting Romney because he's running as the most conservative of the top-tier candidates. Now that Huckabee has demonstrated his viability, it's not hard to imagine him peeling off a decent number of Romney's conservative backers.
I read this and though, "Hey, that's me!" Romney is a good guy and I would be happy to vote for him as president. But he's not a great guy. I'm not sure I can trust him on immigration or court nominees, and he's not talking about killing federal programs. Huckabee is probably to my right on the first two issues, which makes him a good balance to the Washington machine, and he's as far right as you can get on the third issue and still have any chance of being elected --which is still well to my left :-).
There's another good reason to like Huckabee: he's cool. Here's a music video of him playing the Credence tune Green River
I never particularly liked CCR's album version, but this band makes it sound good. In the clip, Huckabee says that he has a band called "Capitol Offense" (I'm guessing at the spelling of "Capitol" as a pun on the fact that the band members came from the state capitol). Huckabee plays an electric bass, which is way cooler than a saxophone. I found another clip where he's playing Sweet Home Alabama, but the audio is so bad that it's not worth linking. And according to the Des Moines Register
, he was doing Free Bird at Ames. I'm not crazy about Free Bird, but the guy's been seen playing two Skynard tunes and one CCR, so he's officially cool even if he does play an occasional song by the Beetles --the most over-rated band in all of world history. This coolness factor, if played right, has the potential to suppress a lot of the anti-Christian hostility (in the voice of Bart Simpson's bus driver): "Hey, dude, sure he's like a preacher-dude, but he also plays the Stones, dude. Rock on!"footnotes
* Not that I think it is embarrassing to be skeptical about evolution
, just that in the current debate-stifling environment, you can't possibly argue such a position in a way that won't leave a substantial proportion of Americans thinking that you are a loon, even in a supposedly open-minded academic environment, much less in a political arena dominated by reporters and commentators who have been conditioned to think of evolution skeptics as loons.acknowledgements
Several of the links here came from the Corner.